In the aftermath of a verdict finding Donald Trump guilty on all 34 charges in what many, including myself, would characterize as a sham trial over hush money, a remarkable phenomenon occurred. A surge in Google searches for “how to donate to Donald Trump” spiked dramatically, even causing his campaign donation website to briefly crash. This episode underscores a critical miscalculation by Democrats: their efforts to suppress Trump have inadvertently amplified his influence, rallying more support than ever before.
The guilty verdict not only mobilized everyday Americans but also catalyzed GOP megadonors into action. Prominent figures like casino billionaire Miriam Adelson and hotel magnate Robert Bigelow pledged substantial financial support. Even venture capitalists like Sean Maguire, who previously supported Hillary Clinton, are crossing party lines, driven by a refusal to accept a society where free speech is curtailed. Maguire’s contribution of $300,000 signals a significant shift in political and financial allegiance spurred by perceived injustices in the current political climate.
These developments paint a stark picture: while Trump’s campaign coffers swell, fueled by both grassroots and high-dollar donations, Biden’s team faces the daunting prospect of needing even more support from long-time Democratic benefactors like the Clintons and the Soros family. This influx of support for Trump underscores a growing disillusionment with the misuse of the judicial system for partisan gain by the Democrats.
The spectacle of this trial reveals a desperate Democratic strategy to neutralize a formidable political opponent through legal entanglements rather than electoral competition. This despicable manipulation of justice is transparent to many Americans who are increasingly rallying behind Trump, ready to support his bid to save our nation from a corrupt establishment.
In essence, what is Trump truly guilty of in the eyes of his detractors? He is guilty of posing a substantial threat to their political dominance. As November approaches, it’s clear that the court of public opinion may very well deliver a verdict starkly different from the one handed down in this trial.
